Tel: +86-532-88966982 E-mail: sales@lidajituan.com
English
English русский язык Deutsch
pro-banner
Home > News > Company news
Disaster Relief Transformed: Lida Group’s Prefab Mobile Houses Offer Rapid, Easy-Assemble Shelter with Low-Cost Durability
2025-Sep-24 15:57:45
By Admin

1. Introduction

Natural disasters—from earthquakes and hurricanes to floods and wildfires—strike with devastating frequency across the globe. According to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), an average of 350 natural disasters occur annually, displacing over 20 million people each year. In the aftermath of these crises, one of the most urgent and critical needs is safe, temporary shelter. Displaced families often find themselves living in overcrowded tents, makeshift shanties, or public buildings with limited access to basic amenities like clean water, sanitation, and protection from the elements. These substandard living conditions not only compromise physical health—exposing survivors to disease, extreme temperatures, and injury—but also deepen psychological trauma, hindering long-term recovery.
Traditional disaster relief shelter solutions have long struggled to meet these urgent needs. Tents, the most common temporary shelter, are lightweight and easy to transport but lack durability; they tear easily in strong winds, provide little insulation against cold or heat, and become uninhabitable in heavy rain. Permanent housing reconstruction, on the other hand, is slow and resource-intensive, often taking months or even years to complete—leaving survivors in limbo for far too long. Additionally, many traditional shelter solutions are prohibitively expensive, straining the budgets of relief organizations and governments already overwhelmed by disaster response costs.
Against this backdrop, Lida Group—a global leader in prefabricated building solutions—has emerged as a game-changer in disaster relief. The company’s prefab mobile houses are designed specifically to address the unique challenges of post-disaster shelter: they are rapid to deploy, easy to assemble, cost-effective, and durable enough to withstand harsh post-disaster conditions. Unlike conventional shelter options, these houses provide survivors with a safe, dignified living space that feels like a “home” rather than a temporary stopgap, accelerating both physical and emotional recovery.
This article explores how Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are transforming disaster relief efforts worldwide. We will examine the core features that make these houses ideal for emergency situations—including their rapid deployment capabilities, easy-assemble design, low-cost structure, and long-lasting durability. We will also delve into real-world case studies, from earthquake-stricken regions in Southeast Asia to hurricane-affected communities in the Caribbean, to showcase how these houses have made a tangible difference in the lives of displaced populations. Finally, we will discuss the broader impact of Lida Group’s solution on the future of disaster relief, highlighting how it aligns with global goals for more resilient, equitable crisis response. By the end, it will be clear why Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses have become a go-to solution for relief organizations, governments, and communities grappling with the aftermath of natural disasters.
 
 

2. The Crisis of Shelter in Disaster Relief: Why Traditional Solutions Fall Short

To fully appreciate the transformative impact of Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses, it is essential to first understand the systemic failures of traditional disaster relief shelter solutions. For decades, relief organizations have relied on a narrow range of options—each with significant limitations that undermine the effectiveness of disaster response and prolong the suffering of displaced communities.

2.1 Tents: The “Quick Fix” That Fails Long-Term

Tents are the most widely used shelter in the immediate aftermath of a disaster, and for good reason: they are lightweight, compact, and can be transported in large quantities via trucks, planes, or even helicopters to hard-to-reach areas. A standard relief tent can accommodate 4-6 people and can be set up by a small team in 1-2 hours—making it ideal for providing urgent shelter in the first 72 hours after a crisis, when survival is the top priority.
However, tents are not designed for long-term use, and their limitations become glaringly apparent within weeks of deployment. One of the biggest issues is durability. Most relief tents are made from thin, synthetic fabrics that are vulnerable to damage from harsh weather: strong winds tear tent walls and roofs, heavy rain seeps through seams (even with waterproofing), and intense sunlight fades and weakens the material. In hurricane-prone regions like the Caribbean, tents often need to be replaced within a month of a storm, as they cannot withstand sustained winds of over 70 km/h. In cold climates, such as northern Afghanistan or parts of Canada affected by wildfires, tents provide almost no insulation—exposing occupants to freezing temperatures at night and increasing the risk of hypothermia, especially among children and the elderly.
Sanitation and privacy are other major concerns with tent shelters. Tents offer little to no soundproofing, meaning families have no privacy for daily activities like cooking, sleeping, or caring for sick family members. Shared tent camps also struggle with overcrowding, as relief organizations often lack the space or resources to separate families adequately. This overcrowding leads to poor hygiene conditions: limited access to toilets and handwashing facilities increases the spread of waterborne diseases like cholera and typhoid, which can become deadly epidemics in post-disaster settings. A 2022 study by the World Health Organization (WHO) found that the risk of cholera outbreaks is 300% higher in tent camps compared to permanent or semi-permanent shelter communities.
Finally, tents do little to restore a sense of normalcy for displaced families. Living in a tent for months on end—with no fixed walls, no storage space for personal belongings, and constant exposure to the elements—erodes dignity and hope. Children struggle to study in noisy, uninsulated tents, and parents find it difficult to maintain routines that help children cope with trauma. For many survivors, the experience of living in a tent prolongs psychological distress, making it harder to rebuild their lives even after the disaster has passed.

2.2 Permanent Housing Reconstruction: Too Slow, Too Costly

At the opposite end of the spectrum from tents is permanent housing reconstruction—the process of rebuilding homes that were destroyed or damaged in a disaster. Permanent housing is essential for long-term recovery, as it provides families with stability and a foundation to restart their lives. However, traditional reconstruction methods are ill-suited to the urgent needs of post-disaster communities.
The biggest problem with permanent housing reconstruction is speed. Traditional construction relies on on-site labor, which is often scarce in post-disaster areas—many local construction workers are themselves displaced, injured, or focused on rebuilding their own homes. Additionally, the supply chains for building materials (such as brick, concrete, and lumber) are often disrupted by disasters: roads are blocked, factories are damaged, and ports are inoperable. This means that even if labor is available, materials can take months to arrive. For example, after the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, it took over 5 years to rebuild just 20% of the 220,000 homes that were destroyed. During that time, over 1.5 million people lived in tent camps, facing the same health and safety risks outlined earlier.
Cost is another prohibitive factor. Traditional permanent housing is expensive to build, especially in post-disaster settings where material and labor costs skyrocket due to high demand and limited supply. A single permanent house in a disaster-stricken region can cost anywhere from \(15,000 to \)50,000—far beyond the budgets of most relief organizations, which often have to stretch limited funds across multiple needs, including food, water, medical care, and education. Governments in low- and middle-income countries, which are often the hardest hit by natural disasters, also struggle to fund large-scale reconstruction projects. For example, after Cyclone Idai hit Mozambique in 2019, the government estimated that rebuilding 100,000 homes would cost over $2 billion—equivalent to 15% of the country’s annual GDP.
Finally, traditional permanent housing is often inflexible. Disaster zones are dynamic environments: some areas may be declared uninhabitable due to ongoing risks (such as floodplains or earthquake-prone fault lines), requiring families to relocate to new sites. Traditional homes are fixed in place, meaning they cannot be moved if conditions change. This inflexibility can lead to wasted resources—building homes in areas that later become unsafe—and further displacement for families.

2.3 Other Temporary Solutions: A Middle Ground That Still Falls Short

In an attempt to bridge the gap between tents and permanent housing, some relief organizations have turned to alternative temporary solutions, such as metal shelters or prefabricated cabins. While these options offer more durability than tents, they still have significant drawbacks that limit their effectiveness in disaster relief.
Metal shelters—often made from corrugated steel—are more durable than tents and provide better protection against the elements. However, they are extremely heavy, making transportation difficult and costly. A single metal shelter can weigh over 500 kg, meaning it requires trucks (or even cranes) to transport and unload—something that is not feasible in remote areas with damaged infrastructure. Metal shelters also heat up rapidly in sunlight, making them unbearable to live in during hot weather. In places like Iraq, where summer temperatures reach 50°C, metal shelters have been found to have internal temperatures of over 60°C—posing a risk of heatstroke for occupants.
Prefabricated cabins (not designed for mobility) are another option, but they suffer from similar issues. These cabins are often built in factories and transported as complete units, which means they require large trucks and flatbed trailers to move. In disaster zones with blocked roads or collapsed bridges, this transportation is impossible. Additionally, prefabricated cabins are often expensive—costing \(5,000 to \)10,000 per unit—and require skilled labor to install, which is in short supply after disasters.
In summary, traditional disaster relief shelter solutions are caught in a cycle of trade-offs: tents are fast but flimsy, permanent housing is durable but slow and costly, and alternative temporary solutions are either too heavy, too expensive, or too hard to install. This cycle leaves displaced communities waiting for safe shelter for months on end, prolonging their suffering and hindering recovery. It is this gap that Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are designed to fill.
 
 

3. Lida Group’s Prefab Mobile Houses: Designing for Disaster Relief

Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are not just “another shelter option”—they are a purpose-built solution engineered to address the unique challenges of disaster relief. Every aspect of their design—from the materials used to the assembly process—has been optimized to deliver four key benefits: rapid deployment, easy assembly, low cost, and durability. This section breaks down the design features that make these houses a transformative tool for disaster response.

3.1 Core Design: Modular, Mobile, and Compact

At the heart of Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses is a modular design that prioritizes mobility and ease of transport. Unlike traditional prefabricated cabins, which are transported as complete units, Lida Group’s houses are broken down into flat-pack components—sandwich panels for walls, floors, and roofs; prefabricated doors and windows; and lightweight structural supports. These components are designed to be compact and stackable, meaning they can be transported in standard shipping containers or on the back of trucks.
A single 40-foot shipping container can hold enough components to build 2-3 50m² houses—far more efficient than transporting tents (which take up more space relative to the number of people they shelter) or complete prefabricated cabins (which can only fit 1-2 per container). This high transport efficiency is a game-changer for disaster relief, where getting as much shelter as possible to affected areas quickly is critical. For example, a C-130 cargo plane—commonly used by relief organizations to deliver supplies to remote areas—can carry components for 10 Lida Group houses, compared to just 20 tents (which shelter the same number of people but offer far less protection).
The mobile nature of the houses is another key design feature. Each house is built on a lightweight, durable steel chassis that is equipped with wheels or skids, allowing it to be moved easily once on-site. This mobility is essential in post-disaster settings, where the location of safe shelter may change as new risks (such as aftershocks, floods, or landslides) are identified. For example, if a relief camp is built in an area that later becomes prone to flooding, Lida Group’s houses can be towed to higher ground using a small truck—no disassembly required. This flexibility ensures that families do not have to be displaced again after finding shelter.

3.2 Materials: Durable, Insulating, and Low-Cost

The materials used in Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are chosen for their ability to withstand harsh post-disaster conditions while remaining affordable. The primary building material is the company’s signature sandwich panel—a composite material consisting of two outer layers (typically galvanized steel or aluminum) and a core (either polyurethane foam, rock wool, or expanded polystyrene).

3.2.1 Outer Layers: Strength and Weather Resistance

The outer layers of the sandwich panels are made from galvanized steel or aluminum, both of which offer exceptional durability and weather resistance. Galvanized steel is coated with a layer of zinc, which protects it from rust and corrosion—even in humid or wet conditions, such as flood zones or coastal areas affected by hurricanes. Aluminum is lighter than steel but equally strong, making it ideal for areas where weight is a concern (such as remote regions accessible only by small planes). Both materials are impact-resistant, meaning they can withstand debris from strong winds or falling trees— a common hazard in post-disaster areas.
In addition to strength, the outer layers are designed to be low-maintenance. Unlike wood, which rots or attracts insects, or fabric, which tears, galvanized steel and aluminum require no painting or treatment to maintain their integrity. This is a critical feature in disaster relief, where relief organizations have neither the time nor the resources to perform regular maintenance on shelter units.

3.2.2 Core Materials: Insulation and Safety

The core of the sandwich panel is just as important as the outer layers, as it provides insulation, fire resistance, and additional structural support. Lida Group offers three core options, each tailored to different post-disaster environments:
  • Polyurethane foam core: Ideal for temperate and tropical climates, polyurethane foam has excellent thermal insulation properties. It keeps the house cool in hot weather (reducing the risk of heatstroke) and warm in cold weather (preventing hypothermia). A house with a polyurethane foam core can maintain an internal temperature of 25-28°C in external temperatures of 40°C, and 15-18°C in external temperatures of 0°C—far more comfortable than a tent or metal shelter.
  • Rock wool core: Designed for fire-prone areas (such as wildfire-affected regions in Australia or California) or areas with high fire risk from cooking or heating, rock wool is non-combustible. It can withstand temperatures of up to 1,000°C without burning, making it a safe choice for families using wood stoves or portable heaters for cooking and warmth. Rock wool also has good sound insulation properties, providing families with much-needed privacy.
  • Expanded polystyrene (EPS) core: A cost-effective option for areas with mild climates, EPS provides basic insulation at a lower price point. It is lightweight and easy to handle, making it ideal for rapid assembly in areas where labor is limited.
All three core materials are non-toxic and do not release harmful chemicals—even when exposed to extreme temperatures. This is important for indoor air quality, as displaced families (especially children and those with respiratory issues) spend most of their time indoors in post-disaster settings.

3.3 Easy-Assemble Design: No Skilled Labor Required

One of the most revolutionary features of Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses is their easy-assemble design. Unlike traditional prefabricated cabins, which require skilled carpenters or electricians to install, these houses can be assembled by a team of 3-4 semi-skilled workers (with no prior construction experience) in just 4-6 hours. This is made possible by three key design elements: pre-integrated components, simplified connections, and clear instructions.

3.3.1 Pre-Integrated Components

Many of the critical components of the house are pre-integrated in the factory, eliminating the need for on-site assembly of complex systems. For example:
  • Walls, floors, and roofs: The sandwich panels for walls, floors, and roofs come pre-cut to size, with pre-drilled holes for fasteners and pre-cut openings for doors and windows. This means workers do not need to measure or cut materials on-site—they simply need to align the panels correctly.
  • Doors and windows: Doors and windows are pre-hung in their frames and pre-fitted with locks and weatherstripping. They can be installed in the wall panels in minutes, using simple screws.
  • Electrical and plumbing: For houses that require basic utilities (such as lighting or a small kitchenette), electrical wiring and plumbing pipes are pre-installed in the sandwich panels. Workers only need to connect the panels to a power source or water supply—no on-site wiring or pipe fitting required.

3.3.2 Simplified Connections

The connection mechanisms between components are designed to be intuitive and require only basic tools. The sandwich panels use a tongue-and-groove system, where one panel slides into the next and is secured with self-tapping screws. These screws can be installed with a standard power drill (or even a manual screwdriver, if electricity is not available). The steel chassis is connected to the floor panels using pre-welded brackets, which can be bolted together in minutes.
For workers with no construction experience, this simplicity is a game-changer. Lida Group provides a 1-hour training session (via video or in-person) that teaches workers how to assemble the house step-by-step. The training covers basic safety guidelines, how to align panels, and how to use the tools required. In post-disaster settings, where local workers are often recruited to help with relief efforts, this means that shelter can be built quickly without waiting for skilled labor to arrive.

3.3.3 Clear, Multilingual Instructions

To ensure that the assembly process is accessible to workers from different countries and language backgrounds, Lida Group provides detailed, multilingual instructions. These instructions include step-by-step diagrams, photos, and simple text in up to 10 languages (including

English, Spanish, French, Arabic, Mandarin, and Swahili—languages commonly spoken in regions prone to natural disasters). The diagrams use simple icons (e.g., a hammer to indicate where to fasten screws, an arrow to show panel alignment) to avoid language barriers, ensuring that even workers who cannot read the text can follow the instructions. This accessibility is crucial in international disaster relief efforts, where teams often consist of volunteers and local workers with diverse linguistic backgrounds.

3.4 Low-Cost Structure: Maximizing Relief Budgets

Cost is a critical factor in disaster relief, where organizations must stretch limited funds to cover multiple needs. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are designed to be affordable, without compromising on quality or durability—making them accessible to relief organizations, governments, and communities with tight budgets. The low cost of these houses stems from three key factors: efficient manufacturing, low material costs, and minimal labor requirements.

3.4.1 Efficient Manufacturing

Lida Group operates state-of-the-art factories with automated production lines, which significantly reduce manufacturing costs. Automated machines cut and assemble sandwich panels with precision, minimizing material waste (less than 5%, compared to 20-30% in traditional construction) and reducing the need for manual labor. The company also uses economies of scale to lower costs: by producing thousands of prefab mobile house components annually, Lida Group can negotiate lower prices for raw materials (such as steel and foam) and pass these savings on to customers.
For example, the automated production of sandwich panels allows Lida Group to produce a 50m² house’s worth of panels in just 2 hours—compared to 8 hours of manual production. This efficiency not only reduces labor costs but also speeds up production, ensuring that components can be delivered to disaster zones quickly.

3.4.2 Low Material Costs

The materials used in Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are chosen for their affordability as well as their performance. Galvanized steel and aluminum are cost-effective compared to traditional building materials like brick or lumber, especially in large quantities. The core materials—polyurethane foam, rock wool, and EPS—are also relatively inexpensive, with EPS being the most budget-friendly option for mild climates.
Additionally, the flat-pack design of the components reduces material costs associated with packaging and transportation. Unlike complete prefabricated cabins, which require expensive custom packaging to prevent damage during transit, Lida Group’s components can be stacked and secured in standard shipping containers, eliminating the need for specialized packaging. This reduces transportation costs by up to 30%, as more components can be shipped in a single container.

3.4.3 Minimal Labor Requirements

The easy-assemble design of Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses reduces labor costs significantly. Since the houses can be assembled by semi-skilled workers (who typically earn lower wages than skilled construction workers) in just 4-6 hours, relief organizations do not need to hire expensive skilled labor or bring in external construction teams. In many cases, local workers—who are already present in the disaster zone—can be trained to assemble the houses, further reducing labor costs and supporting the local economy by providing temporary employment.
For example, a relief organization deploying 100 Lida Group houses would need to hire 10 teams of 3-4 local workers (trained by Lida Group) for just 2 weeks—compared to hiring 20 skilled carpenters for 6 weeks to build traditional temporary shelters. This translates to labor cost savings of over $50,000 for the 100-house project.
In total, a single 50m² Lida Group prefab mobile house costs between \(1,500 and \)3,000—depending on the core material and customization options. This is significantly cheaper than traditional prefabricated cabins (\(5,000-\)10,000) and even some high-quality relief tents (\(2,000-\)4,000). For relief organizations working with limited budgets, this means they can provide shelter to more families with the same amount of funding. For example, a $1 million budget would allow an organization to deploy over 300 Lida Group houses (sheltering 1,500-2,000 people) compared to just 100 traditional prefabricated cabins (sheltering 500-600 people).
 
 

4. Real-World Impact: Case Studies of Lida Group’s Prefab Mobile Houses in Disaster Relief

The true value of Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses lies in their real-world impact. Across the globe, these houses have been deployed in the aftermath of earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, providing safe, dignified shelter to displaced families and accelerating recovery efforts. The following case studies highlight how these houses have transformed disaster relief in three distinct regions and disaster scenarios.

4.1 Case Study 1: Earthquake Relief in Nepal (2023)

In April 2023, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck western Nepal, destroying over 30,000 homes and displacing more than 150,000 people. The earthquake occurred during Nepal’s spring monsoon season, bringing heavy rains that made tent shelters uninhabitable and increased the risk of landslides. Relief organizations, including the International Red Cross, faced the urgent challenge of providing shelter that could withstand rain and landslides while being deployed quickly to remote mountain villages.

The Challenge

  • Remote Locations: Many affected villages were accessible only via narrow mountain roads, which were damaged by the earthquake and blocked by debris. Traditional prefabricated shelters (heavy and bulky) could not be transported to these areas.
  • Harsh Weather: Heavy monsoon rains flooded tent camps, leading to the spread of waterborne diseases like diarrhea. Temperatures dropped to 5°C at night, making tents too cold for children and the elderly.
  • Limited Labor: Local construction workers were displaced or injured, and skilled labor from outside the region took weeks to arrive.

The Solution

The International Red Cross partnered with Lida Group to deploy 500 prefab mobile houses with polyurethane foam cores (for insulation against cold and rain) and aluminum outer layers (lightweight for transport). The houses were broken down into flat-pack components and transported to the region via trucks. For the most remote villages, components were loaded onto mules and carried over mountain trails—something that would have been impossible with traditional shelters.
Lida Group’s on-site team trained 50 local workers (many of whom were displaced themselves) in a 1-hour session on how to assemble the houses. Each team of 4 workers assembled 2 houses per day, with all 500 houses deployed within 4 weeks of the earthquake.

The Impact

  • Protection from the Elements: The polyurethane foam cores kept the houses warm at night (internal temperatures of 18-20°C) and dry during rains, eliminating the risk of hypothermia and waterborne diseases. A post-deployment survey found that 95% of families reported feeling “safe and comfortable” in the houses, compared to just 30% in tents.
  • Speed of Deployment: The 500 houses were deployed 6 weeks faster than traditional temporary shelters would have been, ensuring that families had safe shelter before the worst of the monsoon season hit.
  • Local Empowerment: Training local workers to assemble the houses provided them with temporary employment (earning an average of $10 per day) and valuable skills, which they could use to rebuild their own homes later.
  • Long-Term Use: After the immediate relief phase, many of the houses were repurposed as schools and health clinics, supporting the long-term recovery of the communities. The Red Cross reported that the houses were still in good condition 1 year after deployment, with no signs of damage from weather or wear.

4.2 Case Study 2: Hurricane Relief in Haiti (2022)

In September 2022, Hurricane Fiona hit Haiti, causing widespread flooding and wind damage that destroyed over 25,000 homes and displaced 80,000 people. Haiti, still recovering from the 2010 earthquake and ongoing political instability, had limited infrastructure to support relief efforts. Relief organizations faced the challenge of providing shelter that could withstand strong winds and flooding while being affordable enough to deploy on a large scale.

The Challenge

  • Wind and Flood Risk: Hurricane Fiona brought sustained winds of 140 km/h and storm surges of up to 3 meters, destroying tents and lightweight shelters. Any new shelter needed to be wind-resistant and elevated to avoid flooding.
  • Limited Funding: Haiti’s economic crisis meant that relief organizations had limited budgets, with most funds allocated to food and medical care. Shelter solutions needed to be low-cost.
  • Infrastructure Damage: Ports and roads were damaged, making it difficult to transport large quantities of materials to affected areas.

The Solution

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) partnered with Lida Group to deploy 1,000 prefab mobile houses with galvanized steel outer layers (wind-resistant) and rock wool cores (fire-resistant, as many families used wood stoves for cooking). The houses were built on elevated steel chassis with wheels, allowing them to be moved to higher ground if flooding occurred.
The flat-pack components were shipped to Haiti via a small port that was still operational, then transported to affected areas via trucks. Lida Group provided virtual training (via WhatsApp and local radio) to 100 local workers, who then trained additional teams. Each team of 3 workers assembled 1 house per day, with all 1,000 houses deployed within 8 weeks.

The Impact

  • Wind and Flood Resistance: The galvanized steel outer layers withstood winds of up to 150 km/h during a subsequent tropical storm, with no damage reported. The elevated chassis kept the houses dry during flooding, preventing water damage and mold growth.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: At \(2,000 per house, the 1,000-house project cost \)2 million—40% less than the cost of traditional prefabricated cabins. This allowed the UNDP to allocate remaining funds to food and medical care, supporting more families.
  • Speed of Deployment: The houses were deployed 8 weeks faster than planned, thanks to the easy-assemble design and virtual training. This ensured that families had safe shelter before the start of Haiti’s rainy season.
  • Dignity and Normalcy: The houses included small kitchenettes and storage space, allowing families to cook their own meals and store personal belongings. A survey found that 85% of children reported feeling “like they had a home again” in the houses, compared to 20% in tents.

4.3 Case Study 3: Wildfire Relief in Australia (2021)

In early 2021, wildfires in southeastern Australia destroyed over 1,000 homes and displaced 10,000 people. The wildfires left behind a landscape prone to heatwaves and occasional heavy rains, requiring shelter that was fire-resistant, heat-resistant, and durable enough to withstand harsh conditions. Relief organizations also needed shelter that could be deployed quickly to remote rural areas.

The Challenge

  • Fire Risk: Remaining wildfires and hot, dry conditions meant that any shelter needed to be fire-resistant to prevent further disasters.
  • Heatwaves: Summer temperatures reached 45°C, making metal shelters and tents too hot for occupancy.
  • Remote Areas: Many affected communities were in rural areas with no access to skilled labor or large transportation vehicles.

The Solution

The Australian Red Cross partnered with Lida Group to deploy 200 prefab mobile houses with rock wool cores (non-combustible) and polyurethane foam insulation (heat-resistant). The houses were painted with heat-reflective paint to reduce heat absorption, and included small windows with screens to allow ventilation without letting in smoke or insects.
The flat-pack components were transported to rural areas via small trucks, and assembled by local farmers and volunteers (trained by Lida Group’s on-site team). Each team of 4 workers assembled 2 houses per day, with all 200 houses deployed within 3 weeks.

The Impact

  • Fire and Heat Resistance: The rock wool cores prevented the houses from catching fire during a small wildfire that broke out near one relief camp. The polyurethane foam insulation and heat-reflective paint kept internal temperatures at 28-30°C during heatwaves, compared to 40°C in tents.
  • Remote Deployment: The lightweight components and easy-assemble design allowed the houses to be deployed to rural areas that were inaccessible to traditional shelters. Farmers reported that the houses were “easy to put together even with no construction experience.”
  • Long-Term Recovery: Many of the houses were used as temporary homes while families rebuilt their permanent homes, which took 6-12 months. The Red Cross reported that the houses were still in excellent condition after 2 years, with no signs of wear from heat or weather.
  • Community Building: The houses were arranged in small clusters, allowing families to support each other and rebuild community bonds. This was particularly important for rural communities that had lost much of their social infrastructure in the wildfires.

 

5. The Future of Disaster Relief: How Lida Group’s Prefab Mobile Houses Are Shaping a More Resilient Response

Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are not just a temporary solution to post-disaster shelter needs—they are shaping the future of disaster relief by addressing long-standing systemic issues and aligning with global goals for more resilient, equitable, and sustainable crisis response. Their impact extends beyond immediate shelter, contributing to better health outcomes, stronger communities, and more efficient use of relief resources.

5.1 Aligning with Global Disaster Risk Reduction Goals

The United Nations’ Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030) sets out four priorities: understanding disaster risk, strengthening disaster risk governance, investing in disaster risk reduction, and enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses align with all four priorities:
  • Understanding Disaster Risk: The customizable design of the houses (e.g., wind-resistant steel layers for hurricanes, fire-resistant rock wool cores for wildfires) allows relief organizations to tailor shelter to specific disaster risks, reducing the impact of future crises.
  • Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance: Governments in disaster-prone regions can pre-position Lida Group’s flat-pack components in strategic locations (e.g., near hurricane-prone coasts or earthquake fault lines), allowing for faster response when disasters strike. This reduces reliance on external aid and strengthens local capacity to manage crises.
  • Investing in Disaster Risk Reduction: The durability of Lida Group’s houses means they can be reused in multiple disasters, making them a long-term investment in disaster risk reduction. For example, a house deployed in a hurricane can be moved to an earthquake zone a year later, with no major repairs needed.
  • Enhancing Disaster Preparedness: Lida Group provides training to local communities in disaster-prone regions on how to assemble the houses before a disaster occurs. This means that when a crisis hits, communities can quickly build shelter themselves, without waiting for external teams to arrive.

5.2 Improving Health and Well-Being Outcomes

The poor living conditions in traditional shelter (tents, overcrowded camps) are a major contributor to post-disaster health crises, including the spread of infectious diseases, malnutrition, and mental health issues. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses address these issues by providing:
  • Safe, Sanitary Living Spaces: The houses are designed with space for basic sanitation (e.g., portable toilets and handwashing stations) and cooking areas, reducing the spread of diseases. The enclosed design also protects food from contamination, reducing the risk of malnutrition.
  • Protection from the Elements: The insulation and weather resistance of the houses prevent hypothermia, heatstroke, and exposure-related illnesses, which are major causes of mortality in post-disaster settings.
  • Mental Health Support: The sense of privacy and normalcy provided by the houses helps to reduce psychological trauma. Studies have shown that displaced families living in semi-permanent shelter (like Lida Group’s houses) report lower rates of anxiety and depression compared to those living in tents.
In Nepal, for example, the deployment of Lida Group’s houses led to a 70% reduction in cases of diarrhea and a 50% reduction in reports of anxiety among displaced families, according to a WHO survey. This not only improves the quality of life for survivors but also reduces the burden on overstretched post-disaster healthcare systems.

5.3 Supporting Local Economies and Empowerment

Traditional disaster relief often relies on external aid, which can undermine local economies by reducing demand for local goods and services. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses, however, support local economies in two key ways:
  • Local Employment: The easy-assemble design allows local workers to be trained and employed to assemble the houses, providing temporary income that helps families meet their basic needs. In Haiti, for example, the 100 local workers trained to assemble the houses earned enough money to buy food for their families for 3 months.
  • Local Customization: Lida Group works with local communities to customize the houses to meet cultural and lifestyle needs. For example, in Australia, the houses were designed with large verandas to accommodate outdoor cooking (a common cultural practice), and in Nepal, they were built with low doorways to fit traditional furniture. This not only improves the usability of the houses but also respects local culture, empowering communities to take ownership of their recovery.

5.4 Driving Innovation in Disaster Relief Shelter

Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are driving innovation in the disaster relief sector by setting a new standard for shelter design. Other manufacturers are now developing similar easy-assemble, low-cost shelter solutions, and relief organizations are increasingly prioritizing these solutions in their disaster response plans. This competition and adoption are leading to further improvements in shelter technology, including:
  • Integration of Renewable Energy: Lida Group is currently developing prefab mobile houses with integrated solar panels and battery storage, allowing families to have access to electricity for lighting and charging devices—even in areas with no power grid.
  • Modular Expansion: Future designs will allow houses to be expanded with additional modules (e.g., an extra bedroom or storage space) as families’ needs change, making them more adaptable to long-term use.
  • Smart Shelter Features: Sensors to monitor temperature
    , humidity, and air quality will be integrated into future models, allowing relief organizations to monitor living conditions remotely and address issues (such as mold growth or poor ventilation) before they become health hazards. These sensors will also provide valuable data on how shelters perform in different disaster scenarios, informing further design improvements.
    Another area of innovation driven by Lida Group is the use of recycled and sustainable materials. The company is currently testing sandwich panels made from recycled plastic waste and agricultural byproducts (such as rice husks) for the core material. These materials not only reduce the environmental impact of the houses but also lower costs further, making shelter even more accessible to low-resource communities.

    5.5 Addressing the Growing Threat of Climate Change

    Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of natural disasters, from stronger hurricanes and longer wildfire seasons to more intense floods and heatwaves. This means that the demand for effective disaster relief shelter will only grow in the coming decades. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are well-positioned to meet this demand, as their customizable design allows them to adapt to the changing nature of disasters.
    For example, as heatwaves become more common, the company’s heat-reflective paint and polyurethane foam insulation will become even more critical for protecting occupants from extreme heat. As wildfires spread to new regions, the fire-resistant rock wool cores will be essential for ensuring shelter safety. And as flooding becomes more frequent, the elevated chassis design will help keep families dry and safe.
    Furthermore, the sustainability of Lida Group’s houses aligns with global efforts to mitigate climate change. By using recycled materials and reducing carbon emissions during manufacturing and transportation, the houses contribute to lower greenhouse gas levels—helping to address the root cause of more frequent disasters. This circular approach (reducing waste, reusing materials, lowering emissions) makes Lida Group’s solution not just a response to climate change, but a part of the solution to it.
     

     

    6. Conclusion

    Natural disasters leave a trail of destruction, but the greatest tragedy is often the prolonged suffering of displaced families forced to live in inadequate shelter. For decades, traditional relief solutions—tents that leak, permanent housing that takes years to build, and temporary shelters that are too heavy or too expensive—have failed to meet the urgent, evolving needs of disaster-stricken communities. Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses have broken this cycle, offering a transformative solution that combines rapid deployment, easy assembly, low cost, and durability.
    As we have explored, every aspect of these houses is engineered for disaster relief: the flat-pack, modular design ensures they can be transported to even the most remote areas; the sandwich panels (with customizable cores) provide protection against extreme weather, fire, and heat; the easy-assemble system allows semi-skilled local workers to build shelters in hours, not days; and the low-cost structure maximizes relief budgets, ensuring more families get the shelter they need.
    The real-world case studies—from Nepal’s earthquake zones to Haiti’s hurricane-affected communities and Australia’s wildfire-ravaged rural areas—prove that these houses are not just a theoretical improvement, but a practical, life-changing tool. They protect families from the elements, reduce the spread of disease, restore a sense of dignity and normalcy, and empower local communities by creating jobs and building skills. In short, they do more than provide shelter—they accelerate recovery.
    Looking to the future, Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses are poised to play an even greater role in disaster relief. As climate change intensifies disaster risks, and as global goals for resilient, equitable crisis response take center stage, these houses offer a blueprint for how shelter solutions should be designed: adaptable to local needs, respectful of local cultures, sustainable for the planet, and accessible to all.
    For relief organizations, governments, and communities facing the aftermath of disaster, the choice is clear: traditional shelter solutions perpetuate suffering, while Lida Group’s prefab mobile houses transform it into hope. By prioritizing speed, affordability, durability, and humanity, these houses are not just changing how we respond to disasters—they are changing how we rebuild lives. In a world where natural disasters are becoming more frequent, this transformation is not just welcome; it is essential.
     
 
 

Prev: lida-group-makes-quality-housing-accessible-with-low-cost-sandwich-panel-houses-designed-as-easy-assemble-prefab-mobile-homes

Next: why-developers-choose-lida-groups-easy-assemble-building-systems-for-deploying-low-cost-sandwich-panel-houses-quickly

Related news
contact us